Friday, December 30, 2011
Let's consider a piece of fiction, a novella by Ted Chiang: "The Lifecycle of Software Objects"
Fiction, it is. However, Ted Chiang gives you a glimpse, into a possible path of development from a Siri/Iris type of personal assistant to a conscious software intelligence. The initial suspension of disbelief asks the reader to accept that an increasingly more adept and responsive software package begins to be self-aware in relationship to the software's user. However, this is no horror story! The users find the software increasingly useful and interesting, and for those reasons provide a rich environment for the software object and a free run of some virtual worlds in which to experience new events and people. Sure it's fiction, and many of today's naysayers loudly assert that no software could ever become self-aware. Personally, I find strong assertions about possible futures interesting, but take them all, regardless of source - be it Kurzweil or Joy - with a touch of patient skepticism. You may suspect I'm in the camp of positivists, and you'd be correct. If you prefer to doomsday stories, go for it. I recommend you read this novella, because it is startlingly good and is also a quick read, being less than 30,000 words.
Fiction, it is. However, Ted Chiang gives you a glimpse, into a possible path of development from a Siri/Iris type of personal assistant to a conscious software intelligence. The initial suspension of disbelief asks the reader to accept that an increasingly more adept and responsive software package begins to be self-aware in relationship to the software's user. However, this is no horror story! The users find the software increasingly useful and interesting, and for those reasons provide a rich environment for the software object and a free run of some virtual worlds in which to experience new events and people. Sure it's fiction, and many of today's naysayers loudly assert that no software could ever become self-aware. Personally, I find strong assertions about possible futures interesting, but take them all, regardless of source - be it Kurzweil or Joy - with a touch of patient skepticism. You may suspect I'm in the camp of positivists, and you'd be correct. If you prefer to doomsday stories, go for it. I recommend you read this novella, because it is startlingly good and is also a quick read, being less than 30,000 words.
This is no "HAL" horror story, nor is it Heinlein's "Mike", but it is a thought provoking exploration that will leave you asking "What if...".
In the realm of Digitaea, Ted's story is about the emergenence of an Ethereate.
I'd be interested in hearing your views, plus or minus, after you've read it.
Jay Fulton 12-30-2011
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Digitaea - digital beings
"There will be a time soon at which new digital beings will emerge. There may be a fourth domain in the chart of living creatures. Those “digitaea” would accompany archaea, bacteria and eukaryota. Some have at least three groups of species of digitaea: stemeids that are mindclone continuations of hominids, and nanoids that are new life forms assembled from self-replicating nanotechnology, and ethereates for new software-beings." from ieet.org
Our legal and business structures have not yet been expanded to accommodate them, so this web site will serve as a connection for the business applications that will emerge.
Our legal and business structures have not yet been expanded to accommodate them, so this web site will serve as a connection for the business applications that will emerge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)